3. Always Distrust Information Emanating from the Western Establishment Media
What is the “establishment media”? Let us first define the term, “establishment”. It is defined in various ways, depending on who is doing the defining. But broadly, the following dictionary definition is a good one: it means “the important and powerful people who control a country or an organization, especially those who support the existing situation.” Another good dictionary definition is: “A group of people holding most of the power and influence in a government or society.” In the past, it was often applied to conservatives in power; but today in the West, we apply it to the very opposite of conservatives: to liberals, Socialists and Marxists, for they are the ones in power throughout western countries today. They are now the establishment.
And behind them all, although unseen and unknown by the vast majority, even the majority of those within the establishment itself, is the Vatican, the city on seven hills, working primarily through its Jesuits but also through innumerable other organisations.
By “the establishment” is meant, then, firstly and more broadly, the entire upper structure of the power elite in a country or nation: the leading politicians, judges, academics, financiers, industrialists, media moguls, and (in some countries) top religious leaders. But secondly and more narrowly, by “the establishment” is meant the elite, secretive ones who control a country or nation, unseen behind the scenes, aiming ultimately for global control and power: the insiders, the puppet masters, the real “government behind the government”.
The “establishment media”, then, refers to the media corporations and outlets which are controlled by, and serve the interests of, the establishment. We could just as correctly call it the “insider media”; the “internationalist media”; the “controlled media”; the “globalist media”.
And in the western nations today, the establishment media is also the mainstream media. What do we mean by the term, “mainstream media”? This refers to the media that influences the mainstream of society, the majority, by playing a huge role in actually shaping how the majority think, speak and behave, and always moving them in the direction desired by the insiders; the globalists. Once upon a time in the West, the elite, the globalists, the insiders, call them what you will – the ones desiring absolute control over every aspect of the life of the people – did not control all the mainstream media, but operated underground alternative media outlets; but that time has long gone. The people in charge of the western world now, including of the land which should now be called the USSA – the United States of Soviet Amerika – are the globalists, the Socialists, the Marxists, the secular humanists, the liberals. And the mainstream media, being owned by these people, naturally shares their ideologies and objectives. Today, then, the mainstream media is the controlled media, the establishment media, the insider media; and the alternative media is operated by those who oppose the mainstream media and its sinister agenda.
Unfortunately, most people in the world rely either solely, or almost so, on the mainstream media, the establishment media, for their information. This is because they know no better. They have been indoctrinated thoroughly over many decades, and besides, it is just so convenient. In their busy lives, it is far easier to simply scan the headlines of the daily newspaper (either via the old-fashioned way or via their online options), or catch snippets of news from the evening TV broadcast, than to actually spend time searching for and then paying attention to alternative sources of information. And they go away thinking they have “got the gist of it” and understand what is going on in the world. But they have not. They have been misled.
How so? Have they been lied to, by the establishment media? Very often, yes; but just as often, no. The establishment media lies, often and readily, in order to keep up its steady stream of misinformation and disinformation, ensuring that the masses believe what the establishment wants them to believe. But many times, it is not necessary for the establishment media to tell an outright lie – all that is necessary is to cover up, ignore, or gloss over the facts. Present the truth, in other words, but only a small part of the truth. And this is deliberate.
Oh, sure, every so often there will be some criticism of the government, or of the globalists and one-worlders, etc., but this is just for show. They have to create the appearance of being “fair” and “unbiased”, even though they are not, or after a while even the most indoctrinated automaton would begin to smell a rat. But the criticism is always weak and muted.
But how to recognise the liberal-Socialist-Marxist media? How to tell which media outlets are serving the interests of men and women dedicated to changing the world by overturning all that is good and decent and installing their own radical agenda? Answer: when you see them speaking well of such wicked people and attacking or mocking conservatives and evangelical Christians; when you see radical liberal-Socialist-Marxist issues being pushed by a particular media outlet, and then the same radical issues popping up in one media outlet after another, as if they have been co-ordinated, briefed, and sent forth with this mission – for indeed they have; when it is obvious that the “full story” is being deliberately suppressed, that you are only being told what the establishment wants you to know, and that there is much more going on than meets the eye; and when you know who owns and/or finances the media outlets – for wealthy and powerful establishment figures own and/or control all the major newspapers, TV news channels, and internet news sites. These are the ways in which you will recognise the establishment media.
I have said one must always distrust information emanating from the establishment media. But this is not to say that one should never buy a newspaper, or listen to the evening news! It is not to say that one cannot glean useful information from the mainstream media sources, at times, even though they are anti-conservative and anti-Christian; for one certainly can! But only if one “reads between the lines”, and judges these sources in the light of the real facts, the true story, obtained from truly reliable sources. The mainstream media may, at times, report the facts correctly (usually not all the facts, but at least some of them); but never, ever trust it to interpret the facts correctly. This is the distinction that must always be made. Develop and maintain a healthy scepticism when it comes to the mainstream media, be rightly suspicious of what you read and hear, take everything with a whole handful of salt (not just a pinch), and only accept what comes from the mainstream sources: a) if it is nothing but the bare reporting of facts (not the interpretation of them); b) if it can be verified by reliable alternative sources; or c) if it fits well with what you already know to be the truth.