For a detailed analysis of vaccines in general, see my pamphlet, Vaccines and the Christian. The present pamphlet is concerned solely with the issue of COVID-19 vaccines.
The best introduction I can give to this subject is the following, taken from the article RNA Vaccines and COVID-19, by Dr Robert Carter, published by Creation Ministries International on 3 December 2020:
“Due to a massive amount of misunderstanding flying around today, on many different subjects, we feel the need to openly discuss the COVID-19 vaccines that are currently in production. We understand this is a passionate subject for some people. From experience, we find that a significant proportion of antivax information does not come from well-informed sources. This is not to say that all of the information is bad, but misleading arguments are constantly doing the rounds. This greatly concerns us, particularly when considering how common such arguments are in Christian circles. Even people who are generally not influenced by conspiratorial thinking have lots of questions about the new vaccines, us included. But we also know that questions and objections can often be answered by simply stating facts that are properly researched. After everything has been considered, people can then make up their own minds as to how they want to act upon the given information.”
That last sentence is important, because whether a Christian decides to have a vaccine or not is, biblically, an indifferent matter. It is not sinful either way. No Christian sins if he gets vaccinated, and no Christian sins if he does not.
However, what is vital is that Christians obtain their information about this issue (as with any other) from reliable, trustworthy sources. From the moment COVID-19 vaccines were announced, the internet buzzed with conspiracy theories, some so bizarre as to leave us shaking our heads in wonder that professing Christians could fall for such nonsense. Quite frankly it is shocking, and more than that it is shameful, that so many who profess to be the Lord’s people spend hours trawling the net, finding and then falling for crazy claims and theories.
COVID Vaccines are Unnecessary for the Health of the Vast Majority
As shown in my pamphlet, Vaccines and the Christian, vaccines in general have been wonderful inventions in preventing serious, life-threatening diseases. But with a recovery rate of just under 100%, the Coronavirus is not one of those serious, life-threatening diseases for the vast majority of the human race, and it is certainly not a deadly plague. This leads to only one conclusion: other than for those in very high-risk categories, a COVID vaccine is unnecessary for the vast majority.
However: although they are unnecessary for the vast majority, the fact is that all over the world governments, businesses, etc., now require that people are vaccinated against COVID-19 if they wish to lead normal lives. But even though there is no sin committed if one submits to a COVID-19 vaccine, Christians are concerned about health problems arising from it, as well as their liberties. This pamphlet will address these issues.
COVID Vaccines Are Not a Risk to the Immediate Health of the Overwhelming Majority
Certainly, these vaccines are unnecessary for almost everyone. But are they dangerous to one’s health?
Please carefully note the point being made here: all the evidence points to the fact that these vaccines are not dangerous to the immediate health of the overwhelming majority of those who receive them. This is not the same as saying they are perfectly safe! They may possibly (this is far from certain) be a risk to health in the long term. More about this under the next heading. But the minuscule number of adverse reactions to them, after literally millions worldwide have been vaccinated, is proof that they are not dangerous to the overwhelming majority in the short term.
The evidence speaks for itself. Please read what follows very carefully and apply common sense and real facts to the issue, not knee-jerk emotionalism.
Yes, during the vaccine trials some volunteer participants fell ill. However, there is nothing whatsoever unusual about this. As Dr Robert Carter explains: “Events like this happen in all medical trials. And, as larger and larger numbers of people are included in the later-stage trials, it is expected that some people will get sick for reasons that have nothing to do with the vaccination. People may even die of disease or other natural causes. This is expected to happen when tens of thousands of people are involved. It is then up to the statisticians to determine if the number of sick people has anything to do with the vaccine.” When the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were in Stage 3 trials, there were about 60,000 people in each trial, with about half of them getting the placebo. It was correctly reported at that time: “No problems (statistically) have been reported so far. We say ‘statistically’ because in any given cohort of that size some people are going to die, get cancer, or become otherwise ill over the course of several months.”
This is a very important point which many simply ignore. They point to the deaths of people since receiving the vaccines – an astonishingly tiny number, statistically far smaller even than the number of deaths from the virus, which is an astonishingly low figure in itself – and then they shout that “the vaccines are killing people!” But when multiplied millions of people are vaccinated, it is a simple matter of statistics that some of them are going to fall ill from various diseases, and some are going to die. It cannot automatically be assumed that these illnesses and deaths are caused by the COVID vaccines! In any given period, people fall ill and die from all kinds of causes.
Due to people experiencing blood clots after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine, several European countries halted the vaccinations temporarily. Reuters reported that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) “repeatedly said the benefits of the AstraZeneca shot outweigh the risks as it investigates 44 reports of an extremely rare brain clotting ailment known as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST)”. Then in late March 2021 Germany’s health department reported that an additional 21 people who received the AstraZeneca vaccine suffered blood clots, and seven of them died. The chairman of the EMA team evaluating the vaccine, Marco Cavaleri, stated that in his opinion, “we can now say it, it is clear that there is an association (of the brain blood clots) with the vaccine.”
Right on cue, anti-vaxers immediately began to claim that the vaccine was a terrible killer, an immediate health danger to multitudes. But was this true?
No, it was not. In giving the figures above, I deliberately did not give the entire quote, to show how people exaggerate or manipulate the facts. The full quote is as follows: the EMA “repeatedly said the benefits of the AstraZeneca shot outweigh the risks as it investigates 44 reports of an extremely rare brain clotting ailment known as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) out of 9.2 million people in the European Economic Area who have received the vaccine” (emphasis added). 44 out of 9.2 million! And as for the seven people who died in Germany, this was after about 2.27 million AstraZeneca doses had been administered! Therefore, even if it was positively established that those people suffered clots as a result of receiving the vaccine, an incredibly tiny percentage of deaths were the result of this vaccine! Seven out of 2.27 million! Based on statistics like that, no person can honestly claim the vaccine is a great killer.
Likewise, in April 2021 the EMA began a review to assess blood clots in people who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, after four cases of unusual blood clots in the U.S., one of which was fatal, emerged after immunisation with the shot. But again we must take note of the figures: in the U.S. the vaccine had by then been given to almost 5 million people. Thus one out of 5 million died. No reasonable person could claim that this was a huge health risk. People do things every single day of their lives which are far riskier than this! And when the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) urged that the J&J vaccine be put on hold, this was triggered by the fact that by that time six people had suffered from the “rare and severe” type of blood clot. But this was after over 6 million people had been vaccinated. Six out of 6 million equates to one in a million. To put this in perspective, the risk of one in a million equates to being struck by lightning – twice!
As creation scientist Dr Jonathan Sarfati wrote in late June 2021: “At time of writing, 2.75 billion people have been vaccinated – including many of the developers of the vaccine, who are thus ‘eating their own cooking’. So we have an enormous sample size…. Some have been concerned with a CDC report in mid-April 2021 that more than 5,800 out of more than 75M fully vaccinated people in the U.S. have caught C19 anyway. These are called ‘breakthrough cases’. Of these, 396 were hospitalized and 74 people died. But let’s work out the effectiveness. For a 95%-effective vaccine, we would expect 5% of the 75M to catch it, i.e. 3.75M. But only 5,800 caught it, i.e. only 0.0075%. That is, the vaccine is really 99.9925% effective!”
This in no way is meant to negate the pain and suffering of those who may have been harmed by these vaccines. But people die of all kinds of things every day which are deemed risky to some extent, yet they take those risks. People die daily in hospital operating theatres. People have adverse reactions to all kinds of medications every single day, and at times these result in death. Others have adverse reactions to certain foods – and die. Life is uncertain. It is full of risks, and we take risks every day of our lives without batting an eyelid. Sometimes people die naturally, and sometimes they die (as we say) unnaturally, or “prematurely” (although every death is in the sovereign Lord’s perfect time). The short-term risks of taking these vaccines are just incredibly small.
Christians must be absolutely honest in all that they say or write, which means we must not exaggerate or distort the true facts. It’s all very well for someone to write, “Many are having terrible reactions to these injections, and many are dying” – but how many is “many”? If one out of 5 million dies, this is simply not “many”. To say that it is “many” is a massive exaggeration, which is the same as a lie.
To go into panic mode because a handful of people died after millions had received the vaccine is, quite simply, foolish. As a very, very small percentage of people (compared with the world population) have died from the Coronavirus itself, many professing Christians have rightly said that it is not a plague, for it is not life-threatening to the overwhelming majority of people. Why then do many of those same professing Christians not apply the same standard to the vaccines? If there was no need to panic when a tiny percentage of people died from the virus, there is no need to panic either when an even tinier percentage of people may have died from the vaccine. It is a great pity that so many who correctly saw there was no danger from the virus for the vast majority are so up in arms over the vaccines, when the immediate risk of death is even lower from the vaccines than it was from the virus (which was incredibly low itself)!
COVID Vaccines May be a Risk to Health in the Long Term (But This is Far from Certain)
The immediate threat to health posed by the COVID vaccines is virtually zero, and thus the panic over the vaccines is unnecessary for this reason. But the long-term effects of the COVID vaccines are simply unknown. They may pose a risk to health some years down the line. We simply do not know. They haven’t been around long enough for us to have any idea. “Nobody can say that there is a zero percent probability that the RNA in the transfected cells cannot jump to other somatic cells, in which case this might lead to more serious autoimmune complications. On the other hand, we cannot say with 100% confidence that this will not happen naturally when a person is exposed to any virus in the wild.” “This is an unknown technology. We will not know what will really happen until we release it into the public arena [as has now been done]. However, this is always true with everything we do. Using common sense and past experience, most potential problems can be avoided.”
Many believe the production of the COVID-19 vaccines was too rushed, without adequate safety tests being conducted over a period of years. “However, it’s important to note that the main purpose of trials is to determine the most effective dosage levels required to train the immune system effectively. But trials also track safety. Another point is that many of the proposed C19 vaccines won’t be totally new technology, but will be made by the extensively tested technology used to make other safe and effective vaccines…. The C19 vaccine trials are an ethical form of the ‘double blind, placebo controlled’ method, which is the most rigorous, also called double-blind randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Some people get the full vaccine. Some get the vaccine with the adjuvant (something that stimulates the immune system) but without the antigen (a protein that antibodies target). Some get the vaccine without either. This latter is not a ‘saline’ injection, but the idea is similar. Randomized, placebo-controlled experiments were also used with the recombinant vaccine, Shingrix, very effective at preventing shingles. Such trials are becoming standard in the industry.”
COVID Vaccines and Genetic Engineering: Is This a Possibility?
Although the long term effects of these vaccines are unknown at this stage, the internet is awash with the most bizarre theories. It is incredible that so many professing Christians actually fall for these nonsensical, sensationalist claims. But such is indeed the case: everything from “making us less human” to “making others sick when they come into contact with vaccinated people”. It is truly sad when those who profess to be the Lord’s people fall for such absurdities.
One such theory doing the rounds is that a vaccine which uses a virus to deliver RNA into the cell has the potential for genetic engineering – to actually change our DNA. However, “viruses already deliver RNA or DNA to our cells on their own and we don’t call this ‘genetic engineering’.”
Let us examine this theory more closely. The following from Dr Robert Carter is a very good answer:
“Is it possible that the vaccine could change our DNA?…. here is a list of reasons why the probability is vanishingly small:
“1. Viruses already inject DNA and RNA into our cells. With rare exceptions, this material does not make it into our genome. The HIV virus is notorious for making copies of itself that then get incorporated into our DNA, but they have specific mechanisms and genetic sequences for doing so. The RNA in the new vaccines has none of those features. Even though the wild version of the virus used in the AstraZeneca vaccine can also do this, it is not known to cause any diseases. Even so, the RNA contains but one or two protein-coding genes. This is not enough information to do anything in the cell.
“2. Our cells produce massive amounts of RNA already…
“3. The amount of RNA being used is minimal.
“4. Any cell that takes up the foreign protein gene will be killed by the immune system. At least, this is what is supposed to happen and indeed is what does happen in nearly all cases. A person whose body fails to respond in this way is at high risk of death from any infection, and the RNA vaccine is not an infectious agent. The immune system is exceptionally complex, and we cannot say that every single person will respond in the same way. But if this is a concern, it should be a concern for all viral infections as well.
“5. The arm muscles are far from the gonads. So even if some cells incorporate the RNA (in the form of DNA) into their genomes, it will be difficult to pass this to the next generation. Again, nobody can say it is impossible, but there is little reason for considering it to be probable. Then again, we have sometimes been surprised by biology.”
Then comes this summary by Dr Carter, which if read carefully makes sound sense – and common sense as well, for it is a balanced approach (sadly lacking in the conspiracy theories doing the rounds):
“Considering all these points together, as a scientist with a strong background in genetics, I believe the risk of the ‘genetic engineering’ of people is extremely small…. We can always be surprised, but everything we do know tells us that the new technology should be safe. And that is an important consideration. Even when acting out of an abundance of caution, we have to make final decisions based on positive knowledge, not the fear of potential unknowns. This is something that applies to daily life. If we cannot make decisions based on what we know, we would be paralyzed with fear and unable to do anything. We could not eat for fear of food poisoning. We could not drive for fear of drunk drivers.”
COVID Vaccines and Population Reduction: Is This a Plausible Threat?
What about the concern over population reduction by vaccines? Could the long-term threat to health include the deliberate use of COVID vaccines to reduce the population, in accordance with the desires of eugenicists, by secretly infecting people with life-threatening substances or by causing infertility, for example?
It is true that there are some scientists who are very concerned about this possibility. Dr Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy and Respiratory, who spent 32 years in the industry, holding the most senior research position in his field, is just one of many scientists who believe it could be done [note: “could”, not “is being” – an important distinction]. He explained how:
“[I]f you wanted to introduce a characteristic [to the vaccines] which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say ‘let’s put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,’ or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible],” he said. “Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people…. I’m very worried… that pathway will be used for mass depopulation, because I can’t think of any benign explanation….
“The eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you…. it won’t kill you on the end of the needle because you would spot that [i.e. not an immediate risk to health – S.W.]. It could be something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at various times between vaccination and the event, it will be plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on in the world at that time, in the context of which your demise, or that of your children will look normal. That’s what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world’s population. And I think that’s what they’re doing.”
It is a possibility – we may concede this much. It is possible they would like to use such vaccines as a means of population reduction. Certain other mass vaccination programmes in some parts of the world in recent decades may have been hijacked by globalists for this purpose. It is a documented fact that one-worlders want to drastically reduce the earth’s population, even by murder if necessary.
If mass population reduction via mass vaccination programmes really is one of the purposes of this drive to get everyone vaccinated, it is very sinister. As Yeadon points out, the only way to do it would be to enable whatever is injected into one to work slowly, so as not to arouse suspicion and cause people to blame the vaccines. If large numbers of people suddenly started dropping dead or falling very ill soon after being vaccinated, there would be an enraged outcry and the plot would be exposed. Obviously they are not going to do that. But over a period of time, with people gradually growing weaker and weaker until they die? This is more plausible. However, let us look at this sensibly, with cool heads. “Plausible” is not the same as “probable”, and it is certainly a long way from “definite”; and there are some serious obstacles to this.
Firstly, it would be very risky for the globalists. It is going to take some time for the entire world to be vaccinated, and if people begin to start weakening and then dying in large numbers as the months go by, this would make multiplied millions suspicious long before the worldwide vaccination campaign was complete.
Secondly, so many multiplied thousands, even millions, of people would have to be in on the plot, from scientists working in the labs to hundreds of thousands of doctors and nurses injecting patients. It would be astonishingly difficult to ensure the complicity, and the silence, of all these medical professionals concerning the sinister objectives of the globalists. All it would take is a handful of honest, caring medical practitioners to blow the whistle. And there are plenty of them in the world. Are they all going to be sworn to silence? Multiplied thousands of them? Are they all going to be threatened if they speak up? It is virtually impossible. It would be a conspiracy so vast and logistically complex as to boggle the mind.
Thirdly, pharmaceutical companies want to make profits. They want to keep making them. Killing off large numbers of your customers is hardly the way to ensure this.
Fourthly, if the one-worlders were going to use vaccines to reduce the world’s population on a huge scale, why haven’t they done it before? They did not need to wait for the COVID vaccines. They could have achieved this outcome long ago, via normal vaccines! After all, multiplied millions all over the world willingly have their children vaccinated every year against smallpox, measles, mumps, etc. There was no need to wait for the manufactured COVID “crisis” and its vaccines.
The Immense Danger of COVID Vaccines for Implementing Global People Control
The entire Coronavirus insanity is all about people control. It always has been. The vaccines are just an excuse. The real objective is to ultimately get all the world’s population into an interlinked database, with a digital ID containing all their personal information: medical, financial, marital, domestic, employment, religious, etc.
Many countries are developing so-called “vaccine passports:” an official government document which will prove that the person has had the COVID vaccine, but which will in time develop into a digital tracking device and personal information repository, immediately accessible to any official requiring it.
Even prominent liberal and feminist Naomi Wolf spoke out against these vaccines, saying: “I cannot say this forcefully enough: This is literally the end of human liberty in the West if this plan unfolds as planned.” She is correct. The developed world will be a gigantic slave plantation.
“‘Vaccine passport’ sounds like a fine thing if you don’t understand what these platforms can do,” she said. “I’m the CEO of a tech company. I understand what this platform does. It is not about the vaccine or the virus, it is about your data. What people need to understand is that any other functionality can be loaded onto that platform with no problem at all.” “Microsoft is talking about merging it with payment plans, your networks can be sucked up, it geolocates you wherever you go. All of your medical history can be included – this has already happened in Israel.” “Six months later, we’re hearing from [anti-COVID vaccine] activists that it [Israel] is [now] a two-tiered society and basically activists are ostracized and surveilled continuously.”
“It is the end of civil society and they are trying to roll it out around the world,” she said. “It is absolutely so much more than a vaccine pass, it is – I cannot stress enough that it has the power to turn off your life, or to turn on your life, to let you engage in society or be marginalized.”
Yes, the great danger of the COVID vaccines is people control. Herein lies the real threat. It is nothing less than a plot to enslave the world’s people, placing them under the control of their one-world masters.
How do they propose to get around the fact that this would be a massive intrusion into the private lives and liberties of citizens? Easy: various governments argue that they will not do anything themselves, but will simply co-ordinate with business corporations to force it on the people. In other words, it will not always be government-mandated, but businesses will insist on it and then refuse to deal with unvaccinated people. In the U.S., White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that the vaccine passport “will be driven by the private sector. Ours [i.e. the government] will more be focused on guidelines that can be used as a basis.”
Clever. In a diabolical way.
What’s more, the powers-that-be can potentially keep this going forever. All they have to say is that there is a new variant, a new strain, and everyone has to be vaccinated again. It is entirely possible that governments could start demanding that citizens receive an annual COVID vaccination, like a flu shot. According to a survey of epidemiologists, virologists and infectious disease specialists from 28 countries, the world may only have a year or even less before first-generation COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective and modified formulations will be needed. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu put forward the idea of a six-monthly vaccine schedule, saying, “The vaccines we have, no one knows how long they last…. We need to prepare for the worst scenario. The worst scenario is that we have to vaccinate every half year.” No, Sir, the worst scenario is that we will be forced into this big fat lie every half year.
A few, at least, have seen through this nonsense, but whether their opposition will be enough to roll back this juggernaut remains to be seen. The World Health Organisation itself has admitted to “uncertainty” over whether or not COVID vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus – and declared that at this stage it does not recommend implementing “vaccine passports”. A WHO spokeswoman, Margaret Harris, said: “We as WHO are saying at this stage we would not like to see the vaccination passport as a requirement for entry or exit because we are not certain at this stage that the vaccine prevents transmission. There are [also] all those other questions, apart from the question of discrimination against the people who are not able to have the vaccine for one reason or another.” And the CEO of the World Travel and Trade Council, Gloria Guevara, said, “We should never require the vaccination to get a job or to travel. If you require the vaccination before travel, that takes us to discrimination.”
Of course, having tasted the power over people’s lives that a mandatory vaccine would give them, many or most governments may simply choose to ignore warnings like these, even when emanating from their beloved WHO. Time will tell.
The development of the technology to control all human beings on the planet – whether via a “vaccine passport”, a microchip implant, or whatever form it takes in the end – is extremely sinister and dangerous. It would not be the mark of the Beast, as I explain in detail in Plans for a Coronavirus Vaccine and Digital ID Spark “Mark of the Beast” Hysteria, but it is 100% correct to say that it would mean the end of human liberty. All true freedom would be gone. The one-worlders would know people’s whereabouts at any given time, their occupations and incomes, how they use their money, their religious affiliations – everything. Such information in the hands of the United Nations, the governments of countries, and the Vatican and its Jesuits would be truly mind-boggling.
As I have written elsewhere: there have been many times in the history of the Christian Church when believers have had to carry ID documents, work permits, etc. And as dictatorial as such laws were, they complied with them, for to rebel against them would have no biblical support, and thus would not have the Lord’s blessing.
Throughout history untold numbers of Christians have been slaves. Modern westerners have become used to demanding their “rights”, but these are a comparatively recent invention when measured against the long history of the world. Slaves, including Christian slaves, had no rights and no liberties. And this would be the state of all Christians in modern times if global people control measures are implemented. Yet what does God’s Word say? Never once does it command slaves (“servants” as the word is rendered) to rise up and rebel. Instead it says, “Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he was called. Art thou called being a servant? care not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather” (1 Cor. 7:20,21). The Christian who is a slave is to be content to serve God as such. Yes, if there is a legitimate way for him to gain his freedom he may use it, but if not he is not to care for the fact that he is a slave, but to serve the Lord in that position.
May the Lord enable His people to view this entire matter biblically!
Shaun Willcock is a minister, author and researcher. He runs Bible Based Ministries. This pamphlet was published in 2021. For other pamphlets (which may be downloaded and printed), as well as details about his books, audio messages, articles, etc., please visit the Bible Based Ministries website; or write to the address below. If you would like to be on Bible Based Ministries’ email list, please send your details.
This pamphlet may be copied for free distribution if it is copied in full
. Shaun Willcock, “Vaccines and the Christian.” Bible Based Ministries, 2021. Available as a free download from the Bible Based Ministries website.
. Robert Carter, “RNA Vaccines and COVID-19.” Creation Ministries International, 3 December 2020. www.creation.com. Dr Carter has a B.S. in Applied Biology and a PhD. in Marine Biology, and is involved in research into human genetics.
. Shaun Willcock, “Vaccines and the Christian.”
. Robert Carter, “RNA Vaccines and COVID-19.”
. Robert Carter, “RNA Vaccines and COVID-19.”
. “European Union: COVID-19 vaccine has ‘clear association’ with brain blood clots.” WND, April 6, 2021. www.wnd.com.
. “European Union: COVID-19 vaccine has ‘clear association’ with brain blood clots.”
. “J&J Covid Vaccine Reviewed by EU Regulator After Blood Clots.” Daily Maverick, April 9, 2021. www.dailymaverick.co.za.
. “U.S. calls for ‘pause’ in Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine.” WND, April 15, 2021. www.wnd.com.
. “Scientists criticise decision to suspend J&J vaccine in SA as ‘irresponsible and unethical.’” Daily Maverick, 16 April 2021. www.dailymaverick.co.za.
. Jonathan Sarfati, “CMI, Vaccines, and Vaccination.” Creation Ministries International, 3 September 2018, updated 24 June 2021. www.creation.com.
. “The ‘Covid’ Vaccine Is a Weapon of Mass Destruction!” Gary D. Barnett, March 31, 2021. www.garydbarnett.com.
. Robert Carter, “RNA Vaccines and COVID-19.”
. Jonathan Sarfati, “CMI, Vaccines, and Vaccination.”
. Robert Carter, “RNA Vaccines and COVID-19.”
. “EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’” LifeSite News, April 7, 2021. www.lifesitenews.com.
. “Naomi Wolf: Vaccine passports spell ‘the end of human liberty.’” WND, March 30, 2021. www.wnd.com.
. “Biden’s proposed ‘vaccine passport’ is worse than you realize.” American Thinker, March 31, 2021. www.americanthinker.com.
. “Killing liberty: Could vaccine resisters be WACOed?” WND, April 8, 2021. www.wnd.com.
. Shaun Willcock, “Plans for a Coronavirus Vaccine and Digital ID Spark ‘Mark of the Beast” Hysteria.” Bible Based Ministries, 2020. Available as a free download from the Bible Based Ministries website.