Exposing “The Da Vinci Code”

  It is nothing less than heresy and blasphemy to say that the perfectly sinless Son of God married a woman, and begat children.  This is proclaiming “another Jesus” indeed (2 Cor. 11:4) – not the true Jesus Christ revealed in His Word!  It does not matter in the least if there are  scrolls supposedly showing a stronger association of Mary Magdalene with Christ than what we read in the Bible – it is the Bible that is divinely inspired (2 Tim. 3:16).  We did not have to wait till the twentieth century and the discovery of certain scrolls to ascertain the truth about Christ and Mary Magdalene! – the books that comprise the Holy Scriptures, divinely inspired, were written in the first century AD, during the lifetime of the apostles, and furthermore were known to the true Church from that time on (see, for example, Col. 4:16; 2 Pet. 3:15,16; Rev. 1:1-3,10,11).  God’s Word is settled.  No more writings are ever to be added to it.

  As for the so-called “Gnostic gospels”: one of the characters in Brown’s book says of them that they are the “unaltered gospels”.  In saying this, he implies that the four Gospels found in the New Testament were altered, and therefore cannot be trusted.  Of course, he cannot give any evidence for this; but millions of readers will accept it anyway. 

  Gnosticism, the word being derived from the Greek word meaning “knowledge”, was a heresy that arose in the early centuries of the Christian era.  Gnostics claimed to possess special occult knowledge relating to God, salvation, etc.  Gnosticism is not Christian in any sense, for it is unbiblical and anti-biblical.  Aspects of it were exposed and refuted by the inspired writers of the New Testament Scriptures (e.g. Col. 2:8-23; 1 Tim. 1:4; Tit. 1:14; 1 Tim. 6:20; 1 Cor. 8:1).  Unregenerate men are always seeking extra knowledge, and there is a particular attraction towards supposed knowledge that is “hidden” from the majority and known only to a select few.  Herein lies the attraction of Gnosticism, in all its forms including modern ones; and herein lies also the attraction of Dan Brown’s book to many: the attainment of “knowledge” supposedly hidden for centuries, occult “clues” hidden in mysterious places, tantalising hints of something beyond the awareness of the masses.

  Men will eagerly sift through the Bible for supposed “hidden” messages or information (such as popularised in the book, The God Code), all the while ignoring, or failing to see, the plain, straightforward message of the Bible – the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Gospel of salvation; or they will eagerly search outside the Bible for supposed “hidden” messages that to their minds contradict and overthrow the truth of the Bible (as in The Da Vinci Code).  Either way, Satan is the winner.  For by such means he keeps men from knowing the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the only Saviour of sinners.  For, “Neither is there salvation in any other [than the true Christ of God]: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).  Lost men eagerly search for “hidden” knowledge here, there, and everywhere; but the true, saving knowledge of the Gospel is hidden from them, unless and until the Lord opens their eyes.  Truly, truly, “if our gospel [the TRUE Gospel of Christ] be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: in whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them” (2 Cor. 4:3,4).

  Thirdly, it is a total fallacy to claim, as Dan Brown does, that Mary Magdalene was supposed to carry on Christ’s Church, for “Jesus was the original feminist”; but that her place was usurped by a male hierarchy, thereby suppressing the “sacred feminine”; and that “the Church” covered up the “truth” about Christ and Mary Magdalene, destroying her character by writing of her in the Gospel accounts as an immoral woman!  One fantasy after another, from Dan Brown’s brain!

  There was, after all, no such “truth” to cover up!  Christ was not married to Mary, and they did not have children.  Furthermore, as we have seen, the Gospel accounts do not say much about Mary Magdalene at all.  Jesus cast seven devils out of her; but more than that we are not told.  So if the writers of the Gospels had wanted to depict her as an immoral woman, they did a very poor job of it!  No details of her life are given.

  The New Testament makes it very clear that Christ chose the apostles, and that they were all men.  They were His choice.  Mary’s place was not usurped by a “male hierarchy” – she never had a place to begin with, as one of the band of apostles!  She was a faithful servant of the Lord, but she was not chosen as an apostle.

  As for the “sacred feminine”, this is all hogwash.  It is very appealing to many in our day, for we live in a time of militant feminism, and of goddess-worship by New Agers, witches, and others.  Millions today are turning to the worship of a female deity, and anything that promotes that concept in the minds of the general public is very acceptable to them.  Warbling on about the “sacred feminine” was a sure-fire way for Brown to up the sales of his book.

  Besides, to believe the absurdity of this “cover-up” is to believe that the four Gospels were written by “the Church” (i.e. in Brown’s mind, the Roman Catholic “Church”), rather than by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.  This, if true, would mean that the four Gospels are mere fabrications, to which were attached the names of the four men to give them authenticity.  But it is not true.  The Gospel accounts were written by men who lived in the first century AD, and who were Christians, disciples of Christ.  The Roman Catholic “Church”, which only came into existence centuries later, had absolutely nothing to do with their authorship.  The Roman Catholic institution is guilty of very many cover-ups throughout its history, but this was not one of them!  It could not “cover up” when it did not even exist!

  And as for the “evidence” in the famous painting called “The Last Supper”, by Leonardo da Vinci: let us for a moment assume that da Vinci really did depict Mary Magdalene on Christ’s right side, supposedly as being a female apostle.  We are sure that authorities on the painting would deny that he did any such thing, but let us, just for a moment, suppose that he did.  So what?  Are we to be so foolish as to make a mere painting, by a Roman Catholic artist (however brilliant), our authority?  Are we to set aside the testimony of God’s own Word, the Bible, attested by many infallible proofs, on the basis of this supposed “hidden clue” in a painting?  Has the world gone mad?  Evidently it has, when millions of gullible readers can reject the truth of God’s Word on such flimsy “evidence” as this!

  The book presents Peter as a “sexist”, jealous and scheming man (for he supposedly knew Christ wanted Mary to establish His Church, but was very opposed to this), and even a man who contemplated the murder of Mary Magdalene.  What a terrible distortion of the truth about the godly apostle, Peter, a faithful Christian and minister!  A simple reading of Peter’s own epistles, or of his sermon on the day of Pentecost, will provide the reader with an accurate picture of this humble, zealous servant of Christ.  Nothing in the biblical account presents Peter as jealous of Mary Magdalene, scheming, with murderous thoughts towards her; and as for that modern-day, “politically-correct” term, “sexist”, it is too pathetic for words.