Ireland Rejects Anti-Christian Priestcraft, Embraces Anti-Christian Liberalism

Getting back to the Romish cardinal, Brady: commenting on the Ryan Report, he said: “The publication of this comprehensive report and analysis is a welcome and important step in establishing the truth, giving justice to victims and ensuring such abuse does not happen again.”  Another lie, for the Romish hierarchy certainly did not welcome this report or any other into these crimes.  For centuries these things have been going on, and yet they have always been hushed up by the Roman Catholic leadership.  The priests, bishops and cardinals of Rome have done their utmost to prevent the truth from ever being known.  The only reason they now said such a report was “welcome” was because they had no choice, it had come to light and been exposed and there was nothing they could do about it, so they had to go into damage-control mode and try to make the best of a terrible situation.  If it was up to them, they would never, ever have issued such a report, nor done any investigation in the first place.  It is as Jesus said: these men “loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.  For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved” (Jn. 3:19,20).

Brady said, “This report makes it clear that great wrong and hurt were caused to some of the most vulnerable children in our society.  It documents a shameful catalogue of cruelty – neglect, physical, sexual and emotional abuse – perpetrated against children.”  And: “I am profoundly sorry and deeply ashamed that children suffered in such awful ways in these institutions.  Children deserved better, and especially from those caring for them in the name of Jesus Christ.”  It all sounded good, and contrite – but it was all a sham.  For decades now, it has been solidly documented from all over the world that Roman Catholic bishops and cardinals knew about the abuse going on right under their noses – and did nothing.  They simply shunted the guilty priest off to another parish where he could continue to abuse children; they turned a blind eye.  And this is what Rome has always done, when its priests have been caught out in any crime, as ex-priest Charles Chiniquy shows in his classic work, 50 Years in the “Church” of Rome.[21]

That the hierarchy deliberately shielded these predator priests was even admitted in an editorial of the Roman Catholic southern African weekly, The Southern Cross, which said (italics added): “The culpability, however, does not reside only with those who committed these abuses… but also with those who could have taken action to prevent these, but failed to do so.  Witnesses before the commission testified that they were intimidated and silenced when they sought to bring these abuses to the attention of Church leaders.  This suggests very strongly that the cover-up went to the top of the Irish Church, to superiors and bishops.”[22]  Of course it did, as indeed it did all over the world, not just in Ireland.  This has ever been Rome’s way.  Perhaps the fact that this particular editor, although a Papist, was not a priest, made him more forthright than many.  He added that the betrayal was “in the interest of an institution that clearly was inebriated with the hubris of its unchallenged power.”  Strong words from a Roman Catholic editor, and true ones.  Yet this man remained a Roman Catholic all the same.

Brady also said that the Papal institution “remains determined to do all that is necessary to make the Church a safe, life-giving and joyful place for children.”  The “Church” of Rome has never been safe for children, as history testifies.  Its priests have abused children, and its abominable confessional has been the means of corrupting youth through the centuries.[23]

Another high-ranking Irish ecclesiastic, the Romish archbishop of Dublin, Diarmuid Martin, said that the victims’ “stories of horrible abuse are, in many cases, stomach-turning; their courage in telling their stories [is] admirable.”[24]  Hollow words, once again.  This is a religious system that has condoned this kind of abuse for much of its history.  By the time a man reaches the position of archbishop, if he has not personally been involved in such abuse himself he is well aware of the fact that a great many priests, bishops, archbishops and others have been.  But it only becomes “stomach-turning” once it is made public.

He went on to say that all “Church” organisations involved in the report should seriously examine “how their ideals became debased by systematic abuse.”  The answer is as plain as can be, but sadly these organisations would not, and will not, admit to it.  This is a religious system which forbids its priests, monks and nuns from marrying, which is called a doctrine of devils in 1 Tim. 4:1-3.  It is a system that, by its very nature, encourages a huge percentage of sodomites to enter the priesthood, for priests, not allowed to marry, spend large amounts of time in very intimate all-male company, and then through the confessionals are given access to young children in a secretive, private setting.  It is a system which is so concerned with appearing outwardly holy to the world, that it covers up any scandals emanating from its priesthood, pushing them under the carpet and glossing them over.  It is a system of diabolical evil.

He then said: “We must find ways of ensuring that the cries and anxieties of children are heard and listened to.  This is not a report to be put on a shelf – it’s a real cry for a new look at the way we care for our children.  If we truly regret what happened in the past, we must commit ourselves to a very different future.”  The cries and anxieties of Roman Catholic children stem from the fact that they are forced into intimate, private proximity with sodomite priests who can get away with almost anything because of the high regard in which the children’ parents hold priests of Rome.  And as for not putting this report on a shelf, that is precisely where most predator priests would put it.  This Romish archbishop could prattle on about regretting the past and committing to a different future, but in practical terms, what was actually going to change?  Nothing.  The system is an abomination, and that was not going to change.

The Feigned Sorrow of the Roman Pope

Both Brady and Martin met with the then pope of Rome, Benedict XVI, to brief him on the findings of the commission; this after a series of meetings to discuss the report with Vatican officials, including cardinals.  They claimed that Benedict was “visibly upset” to hear of the abuse suffered by the thousands of Irish children in the care of religious orders.  Martin said Benedict was saddened to hear “how the children had suffered from the very opposite of an expression of the love of God”, while Brady said, “The Holy Father listened very carefully, very attentively and very sympathetically to what we had to say”.  He added, “He said in reply that this was a time for a deep examination of life here in Ireland in the Church.”[25]

A Roman Catholic man in Ireland, writing in a Roman Catholic newspaper, summed up Benedict’s crocodile tears perfectly when he wrote: “The media in Ireland have said much about Pope Benedict’s ‘sadness’ about the abuse when he was briefed about that, but the pope’s sadness means nothing without action.  The pope granted exile in Rome to Cardinal Bernard Law, who was the archbishop of Boston when he was implicated in moving rapist priests from parish to parish where they continued their abuse of children.  Why is Cardinal Bernard Law not being handed over to the authorities in the United States so that he can answer for his involvement in the abuse of children in Boston?  Why does the pope not call for the criminal prosecution of bishops and heads of religious orders who knowingly put children at risk of predators?”[26]  He hit the nail right on the head.  It is a conspiracy to cover up the truth which goes right up to the pope of Rome himself.  Benedict’s “sorrow” was a sham, and worthless, just as the “sorrow” of the present pope of Rome is as well.  As I have shown elsewhere,[27] he was guilty, at the very least, of deliberately protecting guilty priests.

What must always be borne in mind is that the pope of Rome has risen through the ranks to get to where he is now.  He was once a priest, then a bishop, then a cardinal, and finally pope of Rome.  Thus there is simply no way that any pope of Rome is ignorant of these goings-on.  Until recent times they may have been hidden from the general public, but they have always been well known within the fraternity of the Romish priesthood.  There, behind closed doors, sexual abuse of children, as well as of women and men, was never a secret.  The history of the Papal system is full of these wicked goings-on.  The pope of Rome, then, may express “sorrow” over the suffering of thousands of children; but the abominations committed by so many members of the priesthood, and which have always been so well known within the system, did not deter him from his ambitious rise to power within the system, just as it did not deter any of his predecessors, nor will it deter any of his successors.  They are perfectly content to stay within it, to turn a blind eye to what goes on, and to rise up through the ranks so as to eventually become pope of Rome.  Papal expressions of sorrow, then, can never be accepted as genuine.